Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2287-7650

Date of Award

Summer 8-8-2024

Document Type

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Department or Program

Ecology, Evolution, Environment and Society

First Advisor

Ryan Calsbeek

Second Advisor

Hannah ter Hofstede

Abstract

In animal communication, signal phenotypes are shaped by a combination of selective

forces pushing for improved transmission, efficiency, and detection, and limited by

developmental constraints in signal production and reception abilities (Morton 1975; Guilford &

Dawkins 1991; Endler 1992; Davranoglou et al. 2023). These opposing forces have resulted in

communication strategies that are broadly diverse yet similar among closely related species. We

expect to see gradual changes in signal phenotypes across different clades (Harvey & Pagel

1991). Sometimes, though, the communication strategies of closely related taxa are drastically

different (Ligon et al. 2018), indicating that selection must have overcome the strong inertial

forces of both sender signaling capability and receiver sensory physiology. This leads to the

question, how do novel signals emerge and change given the constraints of inherited sensory

systems and signal production mechanisms?

In field crickets (Family Gryllidae), males produce loud, low-frequency calling songs to

attract females. The songs are species specific, and females are attracted to the conspecific signal.

Male field crickets also produce songs in close-range contexts that influence female mating

decisions. Additionally, flying field crickets attend to the high-frequency sounds of approaching

bat predators and can steer away to avoid predation. Although the above behaviors are common to

most species, crickets in the tribe Lebinthini behave differently. Lebinthine males produce highfrequency

songs, females respond with a vibrational reply, and males search for the responding

female. How exactly this communication system evolved from the typical gryllid strategy

requires further inquiry.

In this dissertation, I examine how phylogenetic and morphological constraints affect

signal evolution in lebinthine crickets by addressing the following questions:

1: How have sensory precursors in ancestral crickets influenced the structure of the

lebinthine communication system?

2: How have novel lebinthine signals become informative despite constraints imposed by

evolutionary history?

3: How do the pressures affecting one type of signal in the cricket repertoire affect the

characteristics of other signals within the same animal?

The following work combines investigations of the ancestral origin, extant function, and

contemporary diversity of lebinthine signals to gain a holistic view of novel signal evolution.

Available for download on Saturday, August 08, 2026

Share

COinS