Measurement Challenges in Shared Decision Making: Putting the ‘Patient’ in Patient‐Reported Measures
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2016
Publication Title
Health Expectations
Abstract
Measuring clinicians' shared decision-making (SDM) performance is a key requirement given the intensity of policy interest in many developed countries - yet it remains one of the most difficult methodological challenges, which is a concern for many stakeholders. In this Viewpoint Article, we investigate the development of existing patient-reported measures (PRMs) of SDM identified in a recent review. We find that patients were involved in the development of only four of the 13 measures. This lack of patient involvement in PRM development is associated with two major threats to content validity, common to all 13 PRMs of SDM: (i) an assumption of patient awareness of 'decision points' and (ii) an assumption that there is only one decision point in each healthcare consultation. We provide detailed examples of these threats and their impact on accurate assessment of SDM processes and outcomes, which may hamper efforts to introduce incentives for SDM implementation. We propose cognitive interviewing as a recommended method of involving patients in the design of PRMs in the field of SDM and provide a practical example of this approach.
DOI
10.1111/hex.12380
Dartmouth Digital Commons Citation
Barr, Paul J. and Elwyn, Glyn, "Measurement Challenges in Shared Decision Making: Putting the ‘Patient’ in Patient‐Reported Measures" (2016). Dartmouth Scholarship. 902.
https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/902
